• About
  • News
  • Events
    • Seminars
    • Public talks
  • Research
    • Formal Methods
    • Moral, Legal, and Political Philosophy
    • History of Philosophy
    • Rationality, Action, and Mind
    • Metaphysics and Science
  • Ideas
    • Interviews
    • Essays
  • Resources
  • Department Events Calendar

King's Philosophy

~ Official blog of the philosophy department at King's College London.

King's Philosophy

Tag Archives: Heidegger

History of Philosophy Seminar: Mon 7th, 4pm – Wendland on Heidegger

31 Monday Oct 2016

Posted by Vlad Cadar in History of Philosophy, Research, Seminars

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Heidegger, History of Philosophy

“Authenticity, Truth, and Cultural Transformation: A Critical Reading of John Haugeland’s Heidegger.”

Speaker: Aaron Wendland (Tartu)

Join us next Monday in Room 405, Philosophy Building.

Afterwards Sacha Golob will be taking Aaron to dinner at Masala Zone Covent Garden – if you would like to join them please let Sacha know by Tue 1st. The department can cover the costs of up to two grads on a first come first served basis.

Abstract:  According to the standard reading, Heidegger’s account of authenticity in Being and Time amounts to an existentialist theory of human freedom. Against this existentialist interpretation, John Haugeland reads Heidegger’s account of authenticity as a key feature of Heidegger’s fundamental ontology: i.e., Heidegger’s attempt to determine the meaning of being through an analysis of human beings. Haugeland’s argument is based on the idea that taking responsibility for our existence entails getting the being of entities right. Specifically, Haugeland says that our ability to choose allows us to question and test the disclosure of being through which entities are intelligible to us against the entities themselves, and he adds that taking responsibility for our existence involves transforming our current disclosure of being when it fails to meet the truth test. Although I agree that Heidegger’s existentialism is a crucial feature of his fundamental ontology, I argue that the details of Haugeland’s interpretation are inconsistent. My objection is that if, as Haugeland claims, entities are only intelligible via disclosures of being, then it is incoherent for Haugeland to say that entities themselves can serve as intelligible standard against which disclosures can be truth-tested or transformed. Finally, I offer an alternative to Haugeland’s truth-based take on authenticity and cultural transformation via an ends-based onto-methodological interpretation of Heidegger and Kuhn. Here I argue that the ends pursed by a specific community determine both the meaning of being and the movement of human history.

Tags

ancient philosophy Andrea Sangiovanni applied ethics art Art and Philosophy British Society for the History of Philosophy Clayton Littlejohn conference conferences David Papineau early modern philosophy employment epistemology ethics Events formal epistemology Formal Methods graduate students guest speakers History of Philosophy Hobbes interview Jessica Leech jobs John Callanan Julien Dutant Kant KHOP Maria Rosa Antognazza Mark Textor metaphysics Michael Beaney migration MM McCabe performance art Philosophy Philosophy and Medicine Philosophy in Prisons philosophy of language philosophy of mathematics philosophy of mind political philosophy prizes publications public lecture radio Research at King's Sacha Golob Sarah Fine workshop

Recent Posts

  • Dan Zeman on New Applications of the Assessment-Sensitivity Framework
  • Fabrice Correia and Sven Rosenkranz on Higher-Order Tense Realism
  • Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen on AI Epistemology
  • Lowkey Logoian informal: one-day workshop on Aristotelian matters
  • Man-Devil, By John Callanan, Book Launch

Archives

  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • July 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2024
  • November 2023
  • July 2023
  • May 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2013
  • May 2013

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Conference reports
  • Essays
  • Events
  • Formal Methods
  • History of Philosophy
  • Ideas
  • Interviews
  • Kant
  • KHOPS
  • Mind, Metaphysics, Psychology
  • News
  • philosophy of science
  • Public engagements
  • Public talks
  • Rationality
  • Reading Groups
  • Research
  • Resources
  • Seminars
  • Uncategorized
  • Workshops

A WordPress.com Website.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • King's Philosophy
    • Join 241 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • King's Philosophy
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar