• About
  • News
  • Events
    • Regular Reading Groups
    • Seminars
    • Public talks
  • Research
    • Conference reports
    • History of Philosophy
    • Mind, Metaphysics, Psychology
    • Formal Methods
    • Rationality
  • Ideas
    • Interviews
    • Essays
  • Resources
  • Department Events Calendar

King's Philosophy

~ Official blog of the philosophy department at King's College London.

King's Philosophy

Tag Archives: Heidegger

History of Philosophy Seminar: Mon 7th, 4pm – Wendland on Heidegger

31 Monday Oct 2016

Posted by Vlad Cadar in History of Philosophy, Research, Seminars

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Heidegger, History of Philosophy

“Authenticity, Truth, and Cultural Transformation: A Critical Reading of John Haugeland’s Heidegger.”

Speaker: Aaron Wendland (Tartu)

Join us next Monday in Room 405, Philosophy Building.

Afterwards Sacha Golob will be taking Aaron to dinner at Masala Zone Covent Garden – if you would like to join them please let Sacha know by Tue 1st. The department can cover the costs of up to two grads on a first come first served basis.

Abstract:  According to the standard reading, Heidegger’s account of authenticity in Being and Time amounts to an existentialist theory of human freedom. Against this existentialist interpretation, John Haugeland reads Heidegger’s account of authenticity as a key feature of Heidegger’s fundamental ontology: i.e., Heidegger’s attempt to determine the meaning of being through an analysis of human beings. Haugeland’s argument is based on the idea that taking responsibility for our existence entails getting the being of entities right. Specifically, Haugeland says that our ability to choose allows us to question and test the disclosure of being through which entities are intelligible to us against the entities themselves, and he adds that taking responsibility for our existence involves transforming our current disclosure of being when it fails to meet the truth test. Although I agree that Heidegger’s existentialism is a crucial feature of his fundamental ontology, I argue that the details of Haugeland’s interpretation are inconsistent. My objection is that if, as Haugeland claims, entities are only intelligible via disclosures of being, then it is incoherent for Haugeland to say that entities themselves can serve as intelligible standard against which disclosures can be truth-tested or transformed. Finally, I offer an alternative to Haugeland’s truth-based take on authenticity and cultural transformation via an ends-based onto-methodological interpretation of Heidegger and Kuhn. Here I argue that the ends pursed by a specific community determine both the meaning of being and the movement of human history.

  • Ancient Philosophy at King’s
  • Early Modern Philosophy at King’s
  • Epistemology at King’s
  • Medieval Philosophy at King’s
  • Mind at King’s
  • Political Philosophy at King’s

Tags

ancient philosophy Andrea Sangiovanni applied ethics art Art and Philosophy British Society for the History of Philosophy Clayton Littlejohn conference conferences David Papineau employment epistemology ethics Events formal epistemology Formal Methods graduate students guest speakers History of Philosophy Hobbes interview Jessica Leech jobs John Callanan Julien Dutant Kant KHOP Maria Rosa Antognazza Mark Textor metaphysics Michael Beaney migration MM McCabe performance art Philosophy and Medicine Philosophy in Prisons philosophy of language philosophy of mathematics philosophy of medicine philosophy of mind philosophy of science political philosophy postdoc publications radio Rationality Research at King's Sacha Golob Sarah Fine workshop

Follow King’s Philosophy on Twitter

My Tweets

A WordPress.com Website.

  • Follow Following
    • King's Philosophy
    • Join 22,569 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • King's Philosophy
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar